Thursday, April 25, 2019

Iraq's Future Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Iraqs Future - Essay moralIronically, the aftermath of the usurpation has created instability and uncertainty that has never been experienced before in the ancient narration of the Iraq. The Iraki pot, especially women and children have borne the brunt of the invasion. United states should not have invaded Iraq because rather than instilling hope, the Iraqi people are languishing in despair, instead of ensuring security for all, the caller lives in perpetual fear of attacks. The United States invasion destabilized the multicultural Iraqi society and destroyed the unique political structure that has served the country for many generations. Since conviction immemorial, Iraqi people have coexisted peacefully in spite of their diverse backgrounds. The United States led multitude invasion completely destabilized this coexistence, creating hatred among the existing groups in the country. Although Saddam Hussein rule created ethnic and sacred animosity in Iraq, the aftermath of the United States invasion catalyzed the ethnic tensions, which almost brought the country at the wand of civil war in 2007, a situation that has never been experienced before in the invoice of the country (Jabar, 3). According to Amatzia and Barry (52), Iraq is predominantly an Arabic country consisting of Kurds, Turkmen, Assyrians and Arabs. Iraqi Arabs are the majority, comprising of about 75% of the supply population. The Iraqi Arabs are divided into two major religious groups, comprising of Shiite and Sunni Muslims (Pollack, 116). The aftermath United States invasion resulted into a protracted conflict between the two Islamic factions resulting to loss of lives of thousand Iraqi citizens and horrible humane crisis. Currently, Iraq has the second highest number of internally displaced persons in the creative activity, estimated at over 1.8 million people (MIT Centre for world-wide Studies). About 5 million Iraqis have been displaced since 2003 invasion (MIT Centre for Intern ational Studies). Sectarian war, between the Sunni and Shiite factions has intensified, causing death, displacements and widespread insecurity (Jabar, 12). United States should not have invaded Iraq because it did not have weapons of mass destruction. One of the major motivations for attacking Iraq was to destroy the capacity of the country to develop weapons of mass destruction, including biological and chemical arsenal, in concomitant to destroying alleged terrorism cells (Jabar, 6). Every sovereign country has the right of protecting its citizens and possession of weapons is one of the slipway of defending its people. Iraq was not an exception, unless there was concrete evidence that the weapons were intended for other purposes. Iraqi was said to be in the process of developing nuclear weapons that could have destabilized peace in the Middle East and the world at large (Pollack, 39). However, after the ouster of Saddam Hussein, no weapons of mass destruction were discovered. In stead, the country alkali and rich ancient heritage was ruined and vandalized. The military invasion was therefore unwarranted and was based on misleading intelligence. Iraq, which is considered as the cradle for human civilization had rich heritage that defined the multicultural society as the precursor of modern development (Pollack, 94). Most of historic artifacts were destroyed during the invasion, undermining the rich heritage of Iraqi people. The suitability of a political system in a particular country is determined by its effectiveness in addressing and solving the challenges facing its citizens (Jabar, 13). Prior to the United States military invasion, Iraq had

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.